Love for Goodness’ Sake Plato’s Symposium Free Essays

Socrates says, â€Å"In a word, at that point, love is needing to have the great forever† (206B). Normally, it would be my tendency to concur with this announcement; be that as it may, love is significantly more mind boggling than Socrates’ definition. Love is the craving to consistently be glad, and discovering goodness is the way to satisfaction. We will compose a custom article test on Love for Goodness’ Sake: Plato’s Symposium or on the other hand any comparative theme just for you Request Now Love brings the great out of our spirits to direct our lives. We scan for goodness in affection, yet giving up to love and want (eros) is the thing that draws out our decency. The bliss that adoration gives urges the person to be their best self, which is the manner by which we eventually live our lives around goodness. Plato’s Symposium shows this conundrum: in looking for goodness in adoration, we find the integrity inside our own spirits. An individual faces decisions consistently; with each choice there is the choice of acting ethically or disgracefully. The vast majority plan to settle on moral decisions, however paying little mind to the choices individuals make, each individual has an inalienable capacity to separate acting despicably and ethically. Regardless of whether this capacity is something an individual is brought into the world with or is created through training from one’s guardians is immaterial; it’s essential to see that people know about their demonstrations before they love somebody. At the point when somebody falls in loveâ€or is overwhelmed by desireâ€he or she turns out to be intensely mindful of their activities and as a rule puts forth a cognizant attempt to use sound judgment. In observing the integrity of the ones an individual wants, the person in question is helped to remember the significance of depicting one’s great characteristics. This is the core of Phaedrus’ contention, that â€Å"there is a sure direction every individual requirements for his entire life†¦and nothing grants this guidance†¦as well as Love† (178D). He keeps on argueing that the most ideal society would be brimming with darlings and their beloveds since the entirety of its individuals would be continually mindful of being their best selves within the sight of their friends and family. Phaedrus fights that giving up to eros draws out an individual’s goodness, however he doesn’t address whether this integrity exists when an individual is living without Love. Aristophanes examines his conviction that individuals begin to look all starry eyed at when they discover the their â€Å"other half† who fills them with a feeling of culmination. He tates, â€Å"It’s clear that the spirit of each darling aches for something different; his spirit can't state what it is† yet he seeks after the sentiment of solidarity and fulfillment that adoration gives (192D). This feeling of completeness originates from finding the integrity inside oneself when an individual is with their coordinating half. Socrates can't he lp contradicting Aristophanes’ contention since he doesn’t realize that each person’s other half is acceptable. The idea of having a coordinating half may give solace to a few, yet it infers that every individual should just have a longing for one individual. It is regular for individuals to adore different individuals through the course of their lives. Aristophanes may not be off base in saying that each spirit is looking for its coordinating half, however the key piece of his contention in this setting is that when an individual discovers somebody the individual in question cherishes, that individual feels a feeling of completion. I accept this feeling of sentiment of satisfaction originates from rediscovering the great inside oneself. The contention in the Symposium that most stresses this point is that of Socrates. He accepts that everybody is pregnant, either truly or intellectually. The individuals who are pregnant genuinely bear kids; this is their method of spreading life and goodness into the world. The individuals who are have a pregnant soul bear insight, innovativeness and excellence into the world. The two types of pregnancy desert a little bit of goodness and the procedure of pregnancy demonstrates that this decency starts inside the person. A lady has the greater part of what is required to make a child inside her body before finding a darling. She has sound organs that make her body capacity, and she is equipped for keeping up her body. She has eggs in her ovaries that are trusting that a darling will prepare them. At the point when she finds a darling, his sperm joins with her egg and a delightful child creates. Both the man and the lady have the entirety of the fixings to make posterity, however the solidarity of the sweethearts is required to finish the procedure. Similarly, every individual includes intelligence inside their spirits, however it’s important to join two spirits to open the integrity to society. The way toward bringing magnificence and intelligence into the world through otherworldly pregnancy is more unique than physical pregnancy, however is similarly significant. Similarly that a physical desire creates between darlings, spirits can long for one another. Socrates expresses that the spirit is attracted to other wonderful and created spirits, and these individuals associate through mentally invigorating argumentsâ€they bring forth new thoughts and musings. He accepts that, â€Å"when [a person] reaches somebody excellent and keeps organization with him, he imagines and brings forth what he has been conveying inside him for a very long time. Furthermore, regardless of whether they are together or separated, he recalls that beauty† (209C). Here, Socrates says that the magnificence, truth, information, and goodness were totally contained inside the sweetheart before the relationship was built up; it is through exchange that this excellence is uncovered. Monitoring showing our great practices and attempting to intrigue our friends and family can be something worth being thankful for, however some of the time one’s increased familiarity with goodness can cause that person to feel second rate. At the point when Alcibiades crashes the philosophers’ supper, he starts his discourse of applause for Socrates, however rapidly Alcibiades uncovers his staggering feeling of average quality when in Socrates’ nearness. â€Å"Yes, he causes me to feel ashamed,† Alcibiades admits, â€Å"I know completely well that I can’t refute he’s when he mentions to me what I ought to do; yet, the second I walk out on him, I return to my old ways† (216B). Alcibiades accepts he will never be sufficient for the devout and goodness-filled Socrates. Alcibiades concedes that he endeavors to be his best self before Socrates, however he slips by into old propensities when they are separated. Alcibiades pronounces, â€Å"my entire life has become one steady exertion to escape from him and ward off, yet when I see him, I feel profoundly embarrassed, in light of the fact that I’m failing to address my lifestyle, in spite of the fact that I have just concurred with him that I should† (216B). Along these lines, Alcibiades knows that he can possibly be acceptable, yet he possibly has the solidarity to be honorable when he’s with Socrates. The catastrophe is that Socrates doesn’t need to accept Alcibiades as a darling, leaving the last to endure life feeling forlorn and deficient. Alcibiades ought to recollect that he has the ability to be good and show his decency, which could thusly lead him to another sweetheart. The entirety of the rationalists whose thoughts I’ve talked about above uncover that affection draws out the positive qualities in every one of us, however I accept that the great is contained inside the person before presentation to a darling. We look for sweethearts since we pine for the suggestion to consistently be our best selves. We invest heavily in acting ethically, and we feel great when others perceive our great conduct. We have want for somebody when we see their magnificence and goodness, and we plan to be wanted for our integrity too. At the point when two darlings meet up, there is a vibe of solidarity in light of the fact that there’s an understanding that the two individuals will be honorable for one another. Individuals are constrained to remain with a sweetheart for the whole of their lives since they need to keep on being loaded with goodness. At the point when we are without a darling, we may feel forlorn and can put some distance between our inside goodness. We pine for affection since we need the consistent suggestion to be our most noteworthy selvesâ€the self we are generally pleased with. Since Love makes us extra mindful of our decency both inside and typically, it’s essential to recall that we have the ability to be our noblest selves whenever, with or without a sweetheart. Thusly Socrates was directly all things considered: love is the longing to clutch the positive qualities in our lives everlastingly, and being with a darling is the most ideal approach to continually know about being our best selves. The most effective method to refer to Love for Goodness’ Sake: Plato’s Symposium, Papers

Assignments Essay

Pick one researcher engaged with defining the cutting edge occasional table and portray why their work made a critical commitment to the advancement of the intermittent table. Dmitri Mendeleev’s commitment to the cutting edge intermittent table is broadly prestigious throughout the entire existence of substance science. Mendeleev was the maker of the occasional table; organizing 63 realized components arranged by their nuclear mass. His revelation had a critical effect in the improvement of the intermittent table as it set the establishment for additional advancement to happen later on. Dmitri Mendeleev foreseen the presence of new components to be found, in this way leaving holes in the rising request of components. Mendeleev was the prominent pioneer of isotopes and uncommon gasses. In outline, science is a mix of rationale and creative mind and Mendeleev showed these characteristics through building up the intermittent table (Western Oregon University, 2012). Dmitri Mendeleev’s production of the occasional table was viewed as perhaps the best triumph in science history as it took into account further investigation to start. For what reason do you think the advancement of the intermittent table required contribution from a scope of various individuals? The same number of know, the advancement of the intermittent table required various researchers, for example, John Newlands and Julius Lothar Mieyer. Notwithstanding these men, Mendeleev’s table would not be as precise as it is today. As time advanced, innovation progressed scientists’ found respectable gasses and decided every component nuclear number. Numerous researchers assumed an imperative job in building up our current intermittent table as every individual had an alternate information and comprehension of science. To close, the intermittent table was never one man’s revelation, however the consequence of various scientists’ investigations and experimentations. Each had a crucial impact in testing/affirming the hypotheses of their forerunners, perceiving various examples and properties between various components. How did enhancements in innovation impact the improvement of the intermittent table? With the improvement in innovation from the 1800’s through to introduce day the advancement of the occasional table has experienced huge changes. Since the improvement of the table by Dmitri Mendeleev in 1869, researchers have used new advancements to deliver an increasingly exact portrayal of the synthetic components. Researchers, for example, William Ramsay, who found honorable gasses, radically changed the occasional table including an entirely different gathering. In 1913, Henry Mosely fundamentally influenced the intermittent table with his revelation of atomic charge. At last, the most innovative change is credited to Glen Seaborg in 1940. His work on the disclosure of nuclear number reconfigured the intermittent table, granting him the respectable prize in science in 1951. Without innovative headways, for example, atomic reactors, telescope and the substance bonds framework (Alexander Crum Brow)). Seaborg perhaps would not have had the option to find what he did. In rundown, the progression in innovation has critically changed Mendeleev’s unique occasional table and will doubtlessly proceed with new manufactured components being included. Quickly depict data we currently have about molecules that was not accessible to before researchers who were recognizing examples and patterns inside early forms of the intermittent table. What patterns might they be able to see, contrasted with what we presently know? In the twentieth Century, researchers have a more prominent comprehension of particles and the examples they follow contrasted with the individuals who developed the early forms of the occasional table. It was noted in the mid 1800’s, that issue comprised of knotty particles called iotas. Towards the century's end, J. J Thompson found electrons and their negative charge. He theorized that iotas would hence contain positive charged particles. In 1869, researchers started to perceived examples in properties beginning from various known components, in the long run building up the grouping strategies. During the early forms of the occasional table, it was dictated by Henry Mosely to mastermind components arranged by their nuclear number. This example followed the intermittent table idea more precisely than the course of action of nuclear weight. Another eminent pattern started from glen Seaborg in the 1940’s. Seaborg falsely delivered new substantial mass components, for example, neptunium and plutonium. In this way making another square in the table called ‘antinides’. To finish up our insight into particles, their structure and examples they structure in the occasional table starting from the eighteenth century has created. Exposition Part This article will give an away from into the component of chlorine. It will remember detail for the historical backdrop of chlorine, its’ structure, position on the intermittent table and the particles framed. The component of Chlorine was found very early contrasted with numerous different components. Carl Wilhelm Scheele previously delivered the component in 1774 in Sweden. Scheele went over this component subsequent to joining the mineral pyrolusite and hydrochloric corrosive together. He found this new gas responded with metals, broke up marginally in water and blanched blossoms and leaves. From the start, Scheele accepted that the gas created was oxygen, anyway Sir Humphry Davy demonstrated in 1810 that this gas was new. Sir Davy at that point proceeded to name the new substance Chlorine after the Greek word (Chloros) which means greenish yellow. Chlorine’s component structure is like different components that are arranged in the incandescent lamp bunch on the intermittent table. This component includes a nuclear number of 17 and weight of 35. 5. Chlorine is known to be a very receptive gas in this way giving reasons concerning why it straightforwardly consolidates with most of different components aside from the respectable gasses. This component is masterminded into three shells. The initial two shells are loaded up with electrons. In the interim the third contains just seven electrons. Chlorine is a normally happening component, emerging in the Earth’s hull and seawater. It’s plenitude in the Earth is around 100-300 sections for each million (Chemistry Explained, 2013). This component is significantly notable to be a thick gas, containing a thickness rating of 3. 21g per liter. Chlorine is a serious solid oxidizing specialist. At the end of the day, it is infamous for taking on electrons from different substances. In any case, the component chlorine’s explicit component structure directs concerning why it is situated inside the incandescent light gathering. Chlorine has been explicitly situated inside the intermittent table arranged in bunch 17 since it has a place with the incandescent light family. It is known to be the second lightest component in the incandescent light gathering. Chlorine is arranged in this gathering since it contains comparative synthetic properties to other halogen relatives. Some synthetic and physical properties of these components are; that are responsive, they contain seven valence electrons, they are poor conductors and they are fragile when strong. Chlorine has a liquefying purpose of - 100. 98Â °Cand a breaking point of - 34. Â °C. Chlorine is heavier than air and demonstrated exceptionally powerful as a concoction weapon in the channels and fox openings dove in World War One. Chlorine has been explicitly situated towards the top finish of the incandescent light as it holds a prominently low nuclear number contrasted with different components that are likewise a piece of a similar gathering. In rundown, Mendeleev and Seaborg basically position chlorine inside the incandescent lamp bunch because of its comparable attributes. The components remembered for the incandescent light gathering are fluorine (F), chlorine (Cl), bromine (Br), iodine (I), and astatine (At). Fluorine and chlorine, both have seven valence electrons in their external shell. That seven-electron attribute applies to the entirety of the incandescent light. They are on the whole only one electron short of having full shells. The incandescent light have the characteristic of joining with a wide range of components. They are responsive. You will regularly discover them holding with metals and components from Group One of the intermittent table. Fluorine is the most responsive of the incandescent light and reactivity diminishes as you descend the segment. In this manner, Chlorine is the second generally responsive. As the nuclear number builds, the particles get greater. Their substance properties change only a modest quantity when contrasted with the component directly above them on the table. Chlorine shapes a negative particle by reason of a more noteworthy measure of electrons than protons. This iota has 17 protons and electrons. Because of the last unfilled electron shell, this component changes into a negative particle. In more straightforward terms, a negative particle contains one more electron than proton. In logical language, a negative particle is also called an anion. Chlorine is changed over into a particle once increasing an additional electron from an alternate component. This procedure is basic for making an ionic bond. Chlorine’s particle is known to be amazingly dissolvable in water, therefore giving reasons regarding why it bonds with sodium, shaping sodium chloride. The ionic bond that structures is estimated as far as valence, which means how much a component needs to bond with another component. To sum up, chlorine and sodium are an immediate case of an ionic bond that structures when two particles artificially append together. The employments of chlorine in regular daily existence are tremendous and keep on being utilized overall explicitly for keeping up a perfect pool condition and numerous utilizations as a cleaning specialist.

Gay Marriage Essay Research Paper Homosexuals should free essay sample

Gay Marriage Essay, Research Paper Gay people ought to be permitted to get hitched on the grounds that the restriction of it damages their established rights. Marriage is a foundation since quite a while ago perceived by our specialists under the option to arraign felicity, and denying that option to any pair, independent of sex, is unlawful. This announcement, however, is non contested. Truth be told, none of the announcements brought up in protection from the remittance of gay marriages takes into history the sacred rights stood to all universes. The announcements are simply corresponding to the potential resonations ( existent or envisioned ) of permitting these rights. Our state was assembled and has ever been founded on the cardinal standards of opportunity communicated in the Declaration of Independence and through our Constitution. The restrictions of gay marriage request to recover what opportunity intends to America, and comprehend the criticalness of puting an a valid example that denies that opportunity. The Supreme Court has since quite a while ago perceived that the foundation of marriage is one of the rights ensured to all Americans by our Fundamental law. Baning same-sex marriage is preferential. Marriage is an essential human right and ought to non be denied to any single. At grouped occasions in U.S. history, different minorities have been kept from get marrieding: African americans, for outline. Interracial marriage was other than legally precluded in arranged regions, until the Supreme Court controlled such denials unlawful in 1967 ( ? Should Gay? 31 ) . At this clasp, by and by, marriage is just allowed to hetero teams. In spite of the fact that homophiles live under a similar major law, they are non managed indistinguishable rights from straight people. The grounds introduced against the recompense of gay marriage are shaky, and have nil to make with the sacred rights that should be managed each American. The entirety of the announcements against gay marriages need to make with the resonations of permitting the established right of marriage to homophiles, however non with the protected privileges of homophiles. The announcements offered are bizarrely like the announcements offered 30 mature ages prior against interracial marriages. Marriage plays an of import work non simply in individuals? s experience of everyday life except other than in our human advancement? s got goals. Marriage saw as a social perfect is one way to explain the quality of the force against lively marriage. Legitimately wedded straight people would non lose any lawful right or material advantage if gay people were permitted to get legally wedded ( Mohr 22 ) . At that point why the vacillate? There is no ethical ground to back up common fellowships and non same-sex marriage except if one accepts that recognizing homophiles would debilitate a basic common foundation. This was the verifiable in articulation for the Defense of Marriage Act ( DOMA ) , which suggested that leting homophiles to get hitched comprised a # 8220 ; invasion # 8221 ; on the bing foundation. The DOMA generally presumes that homophiles are innately corrupted and improper, leting them to get hitched would fundamentally mess up, and criticize, the foundation of marriage ( Sullivan? State? 18 ) . This case strays from the realm of customary cultural strategy enters the realm of social images. Be that as it may, images issue: it is primarily in footings of images that individuals characterize their lives and have singularities. Marriage saw as a representative occasion, establishes, organizes, and ritualizes the cultural hugeness of heterosexualism. Some portion of the appealing power of marriage for some straight people, is that it gives position. One of the manners in which it does this is by isolating such individuals from homophiles. In the event that you expel that social position, you more distant debilitate a previously ambushed foundation ( Sullivan? State? 18 ) . Marriage is the principle offices by which progress keeps up heterosexualism as a cultural singularity, and is the cultural bit of heterosexualism. In actuality, on the plane of images and singularities, in the event that one did non get hitched, one wouldn? T be to the full hetero. Utilizing a similar explanation, on the off chance that others were permitted to procure hitched, one wouldn? T be hetero either ( Mohr 22 ) . This investigation clarifies why our specialists can guarantee that marriage by nutrient D efinition is the fellowship of one grown-up male and one grown-up female as hubby and wedded lady, despite the fact that this definition is round, comes up short on any substance, and characterizes nil. The guide of this definition is non to clear up or elucidate ; its guide is to ensure hetero control as a social signifier. ( Mohr 22 ) Supporting the common fraternity while contradicting marriage is an ambiguous spot, in light of on assumption than on ground, more on predisposition than rule. Marriage, under any perusing of American protected statute, is among the most essential social liberties. # 8220 ; Separate yet equivalent # 8221 ; was a fizzled and evil arrangement regarding race ; it will be a fizzled and pernicious approach as for sexual direction. The numerous progresss of ongoing mature ages, the # 8220 ; household organization # 8221 ; Torahs went in numerous metropoliss and territories, the liberal heap of advantages in the end conceded in Hawaii, the disclosure in Vermont # 8211 ; ought to non be tossed out. In any case, neither would they be able to be acknowledged as an answer, as some continuous progressives and chipper logical thinkers appear to want. Truth be told, these half-measures, a long way from undermining the case for complete uniformity, just hone it. For there are no announcements for t he common fraternity that do non utilize each piece to marriage. To back one however non the other, to affirm the substance of the undertaking while continue backing the name and signifier of the relationship, is to indict in a demonstration of unadulterated defamation. It dangers non simply sustaining open bias against a gathering of residents however adding to the social balkanization that as of now epidemics American open life ( Sullivan? State? 18 ) . Specific otherworldly articulations against same-sex marriage are evenhandedly bantered inside the houses of worship and beliefs themselves. That is non the issue here: there is a division among chapel and region in this state. Supporters are simply inquisitive that when the specialists gives out common marriage licenses, the individuals who are gay people ought to be dealt with like any other person. Of class, some contend that marriage is by definition between a grown-up male and a grown-up female. Be that as it may, for a considerable length of time, marriage was by definition an agreement where the wedded lady was her hubby # 8217 ; s lawful assets. Also, that changed. For quite a long time, marriage was by definition between two individuals of a similar race. That other than changed. These things were changed in light of the fact that society perceived that human dignity is a similar whether one is a grown-up male or a grown-up female, dark or white. No 1 has anything else of a pick to be gay than to be dark or white or male or female ( Sullivan? Let Gays? 26 ) The issue is at last basic bounty. Gay work powers and grown-up females are residents of this state. Following two centuries of invisibleness and mistreatment, they have the right to be perceived in that capacity. An arbitrary grown-up female can get hitched a multimillionaire on a Fox Television extraordinary and the statute will blend that marriage no less cogency than a belly to-tomb committedness between Billy Graham and his wedded lady. The courts have maintained a splendidly unlimited option to get hitched for defaulter pas, work powers with endless separations behind them, prisoners on perish push, even the crazy. In this, we cause a separation between what otherworldly and moral convention, to expect of marriage and what common governments require affirming it under statute. It might great be that some otherworldly customs need to proceed with marriage for straight people so as to advance unambiguously hetero virtuousnesss. What's more, they may hold great ground to make so. Be that as it may, common statute asks simply four requests before passing out a marriage permit: Are you an adult ; would you say you are as of now hitched ; would you say you are identified with the individual you plan to get hitched ; and would you say you are legitimately? It # 8217 ; s that last request that bothers. When common law as of now allows the reprobate, the separated, the detained, the sterile, and the crazy to get hitched, it appears revealing that it adheres to a meaningful boundary at homophiles ( Sullivan? State? 18 ) . Mohr, Richard D. # 8220 ; The Stakes in the Gay Marriage Wars. # 8221 ; The Gay and Lesbian Review 2000: 22. # 8220 ; Should Gay Marriage be Legal? # 8221 ; U.S. News A ; World Report 3 June 1996: 31. Sullivan, Andrew. # 8220 ; Let Gays Marry. # 8221 ; Newsweek 3 June 1996: 26. # 8212 ; . # 8220 ; State of the Union # 8211 ; Why # 8220 ; Civil Union # 8221 ; Isn # 8217 ; t Marriage. # 8221 ; The New Republic 8 May 2000: 18.

Nihilism, Provisional Existence, Forfeiture of meaning Research Paper

Agnosticism, Provisional Existence, Forfeiture of importance - Research Paper Example The clans of these accounts are considered as agnostics, since they need profound development and spotlight on the uselessness of life; they want temporary presence, since they need important future objectives and compassion for other people; and they have relinquished otherworldly significance, since they have surrendered trust in transforming them and upgrading their profound turn of events. Tribalism influences skepticism by upholding aggregate submission to power, in this way giving up their quest for otherworldly development. The lottery is seen as a joint custom, where all individuals, youthful and old the same, partake in its procedures and results. Individuals know how their thriving is depended on one person's enduring each year, yet they have turned away from their custom's frightful procedure and result. Rather, they legitimize that the lottery is required for their reality, riches, and progression. Elderly person Warner underscores that the lottery can't be dispensed with , similar to different towns did, on the grounds that â€Å"there's constantly been a lottery† (Jackson). He wants for the progression of conventions. He further spotlights on the advantages of the lottery: â€Å"Lottery in June, corn be substantial soon† (Jackson). He neglects to ethically break down this custom that he has grasped, since he can take an interest in it. He represents the ethical stagnation of his clan. During The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas, individuals affirm that their bliss and advancement are results of one â€Å"child's evil misery† (LeGuin). Without this current youngster's torment, the â€Å"prosperity and magnificence and delight† (LeGuin) of Omelas will not exist anymore. All in all, these clans adhere to the laws and shows that empower them to appreciate a â€Å"good† life. The principle issue here is that through visually impaired compliance to power, they are giving up their profound development. By denying to hold onto enduring all in all and moving it to a solitary individual, they neglect to acknowledge their torment and discover importance in it. However, these clans no longer accept that there is an incentive in aggregate torment. Rather, they would prefer to acknowledge an individual's enduring to supplant their own. Agnosticism, in addition, doesn't think about results and Frankl rejects this sort of life: â€Å"We must not scorn our lives and treat our lives as though they were of no outcome at all† (Breakthrough Writing â€Å"Man's Search†). These clans, by and by, dismiss the outcomes of their activities as important. They just acknowledge their customs all things considered, in light of the fact that â€Å"it is.† Tribalism, moreover, creates agnosticism, on the grounds that these clans no longer respect the significance of life. Frankl trusts in the benefit of being â€Å"worthy† of one's â€Å"sufferings,† for it gives â€Å"spiritual freedomâ €  that makes life worth living for (72). The individuals in The Lottery doesn't perceive any significance throughout everyday life, as showed by they way they exist every day for simple needs. The men center around materialistic issues, while ladies are consigned to the local area and follow sex generalized jobs: â€Å"...men started to accumulate, looking over their own kids, talking about planting and downpour, tractors and taxes...women, wearing blurred house dresses and sweaters...exchanged bits of tattle as they went to join their husbands† (Jackson). Nobody gives one moment to ponder the profound quality of their activities, since they are centered around their every day endurance. Everybody regards this day as any normal day with a feeling of â€Å"disenchantment of the world†

Prendergast and the Chicago Worlds Fair - Literature Essay Samples

The Chicago Worlds Fair of 1893 represented a triumphant moment of success for the city of Chicago as well as for the entire nation. Yet, the grandeur of the fair was paralleled with an equally great amount of corruption and abuse. During this time known as the Gilded Age, America experienced many extremes—extreme wealth, extreme poverty, extreme greatness, and extreme horror. Inside the bubble of magnificent buildings and forward thinking ingenuity that was the fair, Americans escaped, at least for a moment, the dirt and filth of the outside world. Nearby, a man named Eugene Patrick Prendergast lived in his own sort of bubble—one that would eventually burst and lead to the murder of Chicago’s governor, Carter Harrison. As explained in Larsons The Devil in the White City, the insanity tinted in both Prendergast’s delusional obsession and in the nation’s obsession with creating the Worlds Fair ultimately led to the downfall of one and the triumph of the other. Prendergast’s life was in many ways similar to the lifespan of the fair itself. As it is being built, many including those within Chicago, have serious doubts as to the plausibility of achieving such a difficult task. Yet, when the Fair opens, it becomes clear that Chicago has achieved something great. Those that attended feel as if they had entered a world that sees no poverty or hardship, but instead one of immense prosperity and opulence. This false sense of security and hope is the same feeling that Prendergast has during much of his adult life. Just as the Fair is a symbol of the country’s hope for the future, so is the idea of gaining office under Governor Harrison a symbol of hope for Prendergast. As he works miserably through his job in a newspaper distribution warehouse, it is his â€Å"grand hopes for the future, all of which rested on one man: Carter Henry Harrison,† that drive his ambition, just as the promise of renown and fame keeps the Fair from cr umbling in its construction (Larson, 59). Ultimately, Prendergast’s insanity and delusion are no different from the insanity it takes to build the fair. It isn’t until the Fair’s success that such insane designs as the Ferris wheel and the massive Manufactures and Liberal Arts building become more then simply wild ambition. However misguided Prendergast is, his own ambition and initiative are not any crazier than the vision it took to build the Fair. The Chicago Worlds Fair was not simply a monument to man’s ability to create, but also a monument to an evolving American culture. Inside the fair, people escape from the stringent social standards of the time period. Young single women from all over the country travel by themselves to experience a world that seems to have no rules, where they too can become new people. Just as the fair allows people to live in a world of pretend, Prendergast’s imagination allowed him to invent his own altered sense of reality. Yet, at the end of the summer, the fair comes to a close, and with it, the magic of the strange â€Å"white city.† At the same time, Prendergast comes to the realization that Governor Harrison is never going to make him corporation counsel. This can be seen when he is asked why he shot the governor and replies, â€Å"Because he betrayed my confidence. I supported him through his campaign and he promised to appoint me corporation counsel. He didn’t live up to his word† (331). Prendergast’s ambition and imagination lied solely in the belief that one day he would be appointed corporation counsel. When he realized this would never happen, his world crumbled, just as the fair—despite its magnificence—eventually crumbled as well. In both cases, the incredible imaginativeness eventually came to an end. Although the Fair was considered a huge success, it involved the overlooking of many less important disasters. Incidents like the death of workers from accidents during construction as well as careless mistakes in design were small prices to pay in the grand scheme of things. Yet, when Prendergast murdered Harrison, his crime was irrefutable. His execution on July 13, 1894 represented the nation and its moral stance in that people were looking not for answers, but for what they perceived as justice. In â€Å"Criminology,† Edward Burke explains that â€Å"They paid little attention to the report that he had suffered a sever head trauma as a child†¦or the fact that his grandfather had died in Ireland in a lunatic asylum† (Burke, 794). For the Fair, however, the shiny outside and wholesome appearance ultimately allowed the public to overlook all of the other issues within. The difference between the failure of Prendergast and the success of the fair lay in the packaging; the Fair’s evils were hidden from sight, while Prendergast’s crime was clear and simple. People have long since believed that the line between genius and insanity is extremely thin. On one hand, the genius of the Fair was realized despite wild ambitions and numerous brushes with disaster. Yet on the other, similarly ambitious dreams of a man named Prendergast were marked as insane. Although one succeeded and one failed, the ingenuity of both lay not in the outcome, but in the ability to imagine something crazy and then pursue it.

The Sorrows of Young Werther Passion vs. Rationality - Literature Essay Samples

In The Sorrows of Young Werther, by Goethe, one of the prevalent themes is the control that passion wields over ones actions. Passion may cause one to act irrationally, a belief that Goethe espoused despite the paradigm that dominated the society of his day: that man should allow rationality and common sense to control his life. The story takes place in Germany in 1771, and is written in epistolary form. The letters are composed by a lovesick man named Werther, destined to take his life because the object of his affection is married to another, and are addressed to a trusted friend named Wilhelm. Werther takes a romantic view on life, letting his heart and passions guide him. He sees death as a heroic escape, often favors imagination over reality, and hates the fact that the men of his time are mechanical, static conformists that allow so-called common sense to rule their decisions.Passion and romantic ideals lead Werther down the path that will ultimately end in his demise. Wh en speaking of a friend, Werther states that he admires my intelligence and my talents more than my heart, which is, after all, my only pride, and the fountainhead of all all strength, happiness and misery (97). Because he lets his heart guide him, the misery he speaks of outweighs his strength and happiness. Werther lets his imagination take control of his mind more often than his common sense, yet another trait of romantics. He believes that one is happiest when under the spell of delusions, as can be seen when he writes of a woman described to him by a boy: I shall try to see her as soon as possible, or rather, after giving it a second thought, I shall avoid her. It is better that I see her through the eyes of her lover; she might not appear to my own eyes, in reality, as I now see her; and why should I destroy the lovely image I already possess? (20) Werther prefers an image, a picture existing solely in his head, to an uncertain reality.It is his heart that Werther listen s to, and his heart that he feels he must sacrifice. It appears, on the surface, that Goethe is reprimanding those who have the same perspective on life as Werther by murdering him at the end of the novel. It seems that those who oppose him are, in fact, correct in their actions.Nearly every character in the novel, with few exceptions, subscribe to classical ideals and dogmas. Classicists, the opposite of romantics, favor uniformity, common sense, rationality, and the mind over romantic ideas. Throughout the book, Werthers friends demand that he gain some common sense: Wilhelm writes, pull yourself together and try to get rid of an unfortunate passion that is bound to burn up all your energy (54). Wilhelm tries to convince Werther to toss aside his passion, the very emotion on which he thrives. Wilhelm is aware that should Werther continue to live with such passion in his life, his energy will soon be spent. Even Lotte, the woman Werther loves and lives for, hopes that he wil l turn away from his irrationality: Werther! You can, you must see us again; only do be reasonable. Oh, why did you have to be born with this violent temper, this uncontrollable clinging passion for everything you touch! Pleasebe reasonable! Your intellect, your knowledge, your talents, should offer you such a variety of satisfactions! (138) The word reasonable is repeated to emphasize the way that Werther should be, according to the classical ideals of the time. Lotte speaks of intellect and knowledge, both of which are basic facets of classicism. Knowledge is based on facts, and facts are unchanging, solid, and static; these are traits that Werthers friends try to impose on him throughout the book. However, Goethe is not trying to encourage people to embrace the classical outlook on life. Although it may appear so, he is in fact doing just the opposite; into Werthers suicide, Goethe weaves heroism, sympathy, and honor.Throughout his life, Werther has been urged to embrace rationality and think things through. Ultimately, however, he realizes that he cannot control his passions; to the contrary, his passions control him. Werther meets another like him, who cannot control himself either: his passion for the womanhad daily grown on him, to the degree that he finally had not known what to doHe had not been able to eat, to drink or sleep; he had felt as if something was choking him(103). Werther, too, feels as if some higher force is controlling his actions. Werther is not punished for letting his passion rule him; he takes his life, and this is what he has longed for more than anything. He welcomes death with open arms: he shuddered with awe and also with longing (133). Werthers death is heroic, at least in his eyes; this is proven when he reads from some songs of Ossian to Lotte. He says, Tall thou art on the hill; fair among the sons of the vale. But thou shalt fall like Morar; the mourner shall sit on thy tomb (149). He envisions his own deat h as similarly heroic, with Lotte weeping for him atop his grave, because he was brave enough to take his own life. He argues profusely with Albert, Lottes husband, when Albert says that suicide is weak: For it is certainly easier to die than bravely to bear a life of misery (59). Werther never changes his view on this subject, believing that suicide is grand. Goethe also uses the epistolary form to glorify Werthers death. It is common for heroes to be described as god-like, immortal, and impervious. Because the letters show the passage of time and end with Werthers death, Werther is dropped to the rank of a mere mortal. However, he is still a hero, and the fact that his death is imminent only suggests that he is normal: an everyman hero. In this mannner, readers are encouraged to relate to Werther, and to embrace his romantic ideas.Though The Sorrows of Young Werther appears to praise the classical outlook on life, a closer reading reveals that Goethe is, to the contrary, es pousing the romantic view. It is the classical element in those around Werther that kills him, for none of his friends can stand the fact that he has let his heart guide him through life. His death touches those close to them, despite their many differences. It is passion that rules Werther: he can do nothing to appease his heart, and must ultimately accept that perhaps this is simply how life is.

Symbolism Of The Lottery By Shirley Jackson - 1577 Words

Shirley Jackson s The Lottery , is a story that is filled with symbolism. The author uses symbolism to help her represent human nature as tainted, no matter how pure one thinks of himself or herself, or how pure their environment may seem to be. The story is very effective in raising many questions about the pointless nature of humanity regarding tradition and violence. The Lottery clearly expresses Jackson s feelings concerning mankind?s evil nature hiding behind traditions and rituals. She shows how coldness and lack of compassion in people can exhibit in situations regarding tradition and values. Jackson presents the theme of this short story with a major use of symbolism. Symbolism shows throughout the setting of The Lottery, the objects, the peoples actions, and even in the time and the names of the lucky contestants. The setting of the story helps to magnify its impact on the reader because it is set in a small town similar to the one many of us may know of, and that is symbolic of everything that we consider to be right in America. The story begins on a wonderful summer day in a small town. The author describes the day as very joyful but strikes a contrast between the surroundings of the town and the atmosphere of the people gathered in the square. The atmosphere is sober, where the adults ?stood together, away from the stones in the corner, and their jokes were quiet and they smiled rather then laughed.(268) This, in just the third paragraph, is aShow MoreRelatedSymbolism In The Lottery, By Shirley Jackson869 Words   |  4 PagesSymbolism is used throughout The Lottery in the character names. Author, Shirley Jackson, uses the name of, Mr. Graves, to foreshadow the story and explain what â€Å"The Lottery† really is. Mr. Graves is the one who carries the three-legged stool which could i ndicate two things: the Trinity, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, or it could mean the past, present and future, saying that â€Å"The Lottery† will always be among the people of the village. In addition, he is also the owner of the post office andRead MoreSymbolism Of The Lottery By Shirley Jackson926 Words   |  4 PagesWhen incorporated well, symbolism enhances a story’s overall impact. Shirley Jackson’s short story â€Å"The Lottery† contains symbolism to affect the readers’ feelings as well as add interest. The story begins with the villagers gathering at the square to participate in the lottery. The villagers chat while waiting for the event to begin. After Mr. Summers comes with a black box, he stirs the pieces of paper in the box. The narrators describe the lottery as an old ritual that the community continuesRead MoreSymbolism In The Lottery By Shirley Jackson879 Words   |  4 PagesShirley Jackson, the author of the short story †Å"The Lottery† is an unusual story of a town caught in a trap of following tradition. Shirley Jackson uses many symbols in the story to relate to the theme. By doing this it helps the reader understand the story and the message she is trying to get across. Jackson uses tone, setting, and symbolism to conduct a theme for her readers. By doing this she creates connections to the theme by using the black box and old man Warner as a symbol. Old man WarnerRead MoreUse of Symbolism in The Lottery by Shirley Jackson1146 Words   |  5 Pageswhat is known as Symbolism. Symbolism is the use of object, name, or person to represent an idea. If a name is being use, a name such as autumn can represent the adulthood of a human. Creatures such as an Eagle, represents ‘Freedom’ and ‘America’. Even inanimate objects can represent ideas; the light bulb represents ideas that just sparked into a character’s head. In the short story, â€Å"The Lottery† by Shirley Jackson, a village has just entered the month of June, meaning that the lottery is to begin.Read MoreSymbolism in The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson Essay748 Words   |  3 PagesThe Lottery: Symbolism In her story â€Å"The Lottery†, Shirley Jackson manages to catch the readers’ attention and ultimately shock them with an unexpected ending; all of which help her emphasize her critique toward the dark side of human nature and the evil that resides, sometimes, in those who we less expect it from. Jackson uses symbolism throughout the story that helps her set the mood and also makes the readers wonder and analyze the senseless violence and cruelty in their own lives. It all startsRead MoreUse of Symbolism in The Lottery by Shirley Jackson954 Words   |  4 PagesSymbolism means like any place, person or thing that is something but can be interpreted in a different way. The Lottery by Shirley Jackson is a short story that shows symbolism, to give hints about the story in all the characters and objects in the story. This Short story takes place in the summer where a small town has a lottery every year round. The person that wins the lottery has a huge impact on the town and the crops that grow in it. Old man Warner is the oldest in the town andRead More, Symbolism, And Themes In The Lottery, By Shirley Jackson1252 Words   |  6 PagesShirley Jackson’s The Lottery, is a realism story that was written for the main purpose of entertainment. Jackson writes about a small village that gathers every year for an event they call â€Å"The Lottery†. Every head of households comes up and draws a slip of paper from the box. Bill Hutchinson draws the first slip of paper with the black dot but Tessie Hutchinson quickly exclaims the lottery is not fair. Mr. Summers then puts five slips of paper back into the box, one for each of the family membersRead MoreTheme Of Symbolism In The Lottery By Shirley Jackson960 Words   |  4 Pagesagainst it shall be purged with death. The beauty of this world is just a mere mask to hide its monstrosity.Tear off its mask and you shall be bestowed upon the gift of the cruelty of this world. Shirley Jackson’s short story the â€Å"Lottery† illustrates the characte r Tessie Hutchinson as a figure of symbolism as it leads to the theme that the norms of society isolates those who are a victim of labels and expectations because they decorate the origins of sins therefore premonition of the ruin to someRead MoreSymbolism in The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson Essay example1173 Words   |  5 PagesWhen most people play the lottery today, they think about having wealth. Generally, people who win are happy about it whether they win one dollar or a million. The lottery in our society has grown to support education and it is often worth several million dollars. Usually, the winner of the lottery gains a lot of recognition for the money they win. But what would happen if there was a small town where people held a yearly lottery in which the â€Å"winner† was the member of the town who was not sacrificedRead More The Use of Symbolism in The Lottery by Shirley Jackson Essay938 Words   |  4 PagesThe Use of Symbolism in The Lottery by Shirley Jacks on Within the first few lines of Shirley Jacksons The Lottery we are faced with such adjectives as clear, sunny, fresh and warmth. She goes on to paint a picture of small children just out of school for the summer, as the townspeople gather for the annual Lottery. This leads us to believe that the rest of the story is as cheery as the summer day initially described. We as the readers are virtually unaware of the horrible senseless events